Drivers 1 UPS 0

Some good news for drivers who are concerned about safety.


U.S. Department of Labor orders United Parcel Service to rehire, compensate Bay Area driver
Employee terminated for refusing to drive due to safety concerns

SAN FRANCISCO -- The U.S. Department of Labor's Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has ordered United Parcel Service (UPS) to immediately rehire and pay back wages, benefits, compensatory damages and $50,000 in punitive damages to a former Bay Area driver who was wrongfully terminated after he refused to drive after raising safety concerns.

A whistleblower investigation by OSHA found that UPS terminated the employee in retaliation for his refusal to work in violation of the whistleblower provisions of the Surface Transportation Assistance Act, 49 U.S.C. Section 31105 (STAA). OSHA determined that the driver was terminated after refusing to drive his vehicle because he felt it was unsafe to operate due to vision problems and poor weather conditions resulting in visibility concerns. Although the driver notified UPS management of the unsafe conditions, UPS management continued to order the unsafe operation of the vehicle. Either party in the case can file an appeal to the Labor Department's Office of Administrative Law Judges.

"It is vital that employees be able to raise safety concerns to their employers without fear of retaliation," said Ken Nishiyama Atha, OSHA's regional administrator in San Francisco, whose office investigated the complaint. "This order reaffirms both the right of drivers to refuse to operate vehicles when they reasonably believe it is unsafe and the Labor Department's commitment to taking the necessary steps to protect that right."


NOTE: The Labor Department does not release the names of employees involved in whistleblower complaints.

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this post.
Comments

  • 4/11/2009 6:00 PM Frank Banker wrote:
    This is very interesting to me. I hope we will be able to follow the story through to the end. Refusing to drive an unsafe vehicle is something I have done in the past. With visibility as the issue, I guess he was dealing with bay area fog?

    It would be great if UPS would just pay the driver and reinstate him as ordered without an appeal. At least it seems to be stuck in the Labor Dept and hopefully won't travel over to the District Court. I hope the driver wins and I hope it is soon!
    Reply to this
  • 4/16/2009 10:07 PM Seattle Driver wrote:
    I'm a driver in the Seattle building and during this past peak season, we had the worst weather and driving conditions i've ever seen here in the great Northwest. One of our drivers did his route as best as he could and returned to the building and was instructed to go back out to help other drivers. He refused saying that it was too unsafe and impractical since no other drivers were getting anything done anyway. He was terminated for failure to follow instructions, but returned to work and was considered a "working termination". He got the termination dropped and an apology from our manager in exchange for dropping harrassment charges against the manager. Now that I know UPS cannot technically do anything for refusal to operate their "safe" vehicles in such horrible conditions, I might have to play that card next year.
    Reply to this
Leave a comment

Submitted comments are subject to moderation before being displayed.

 Enter the above security code (required)

 Name

 Email (will not be published)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.