Fired UPS driver's suit claims he wouldn't deliver pot

A former UPS delivery man from Clarkston says he was told to deliver a package "even if it contained illicit drugs" and was eventually fired after he opened the package and found marijuana.

A lawyer for Steven Mojica tells the Detroit News his client refused to deliver a suspicious 4-pound next-day package to a house on Murphy Street.  As a result, his UPS supervisors then accused him of theft, reported him to the U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency and fired him in early August.

Mojica is suing the delivery company for reinstatement of his job, lost wages and damages resulting from mental and emotional distress.

Mojica claims he was about to contact police when he received another message instructing him to call a supervisor, who allegedly told Mojica "he should have delivered the package, even if it contained illicit drugs."

At that point, Mojica claimed he opened the package and found it contained large sealed bags of what appeared to be marijuana. He continued his route for another two hours before he turned it over to a Loss Prevention employee.
 
A UPS spokeswoman tells the News they haven't seen the lawsuit, but said there are reporting procedures in place for suspicious packages.

"It's nice to know UPS can guarantee delivery to drug dealers and fire employees that refuse to deliver their drugs," said Mark Porter, Mojica's attorney.

In an unrelated case, authorities last month arrested the manager of a UPS store in Atlanta for allegedly stealing a package that contained marijuana, selling it and lying to authorities.

But lest you think UPS is the delivery service of choice for dealers, an informal and unscientific poll on marijuana.com shows senders prefer the U.S. Postal Service.

 del.icio.us  Stumbleupon  Technorati  Digg 

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this entry.
Comments

  • 11/8/2009 7:41 PM Franklin Banker wrote:
    Here is a more recent news story posted on November 3rd, 09

    http://www.detnews.com/article/20091103/METRO02/911030358/1409/METRO/Fired-UPS-driver-s-suit-claims-he-wouldn-t-deliver-pot

    I sure think this is interesting for several reasons. I wonder what it means when it says he had trouble re-keying the package in the diad. What was he trying to do?

    I would have taken a picture of the thing and delivered it as they instructed, I think anyway if these facts are correct.

    It was a NDA package, so I assume it had a deadline of 10:30 so the messages might have been coming in from the customer to the OMS. reasonable assumption?

    "Where the heck is my package? I am expecting an important Next Day shipment of pot."

    So, is our driver innocent? Seems to be, but these facts just don't sound real good for him. He opened the package, which is a big no no, but who knows how any of us might have handled it?

    I think the bottom line is the instruction to deliver the package no matter what it contains. He apparently failed to work as directed, but if that is really the case why did they accuse him of dealing drugs that same day?

    Either the local UPS management there really hates this driver, or we just don't have the real facts.

    Interesting case. I hope we can find out how it turns out.
    Reply to this
Leave a comment

Submitted comments will be subject to moderation before being displayed.

 Enter the above security code (required)

 Name

 Email (will not be published)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.